Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687842›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022

Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models Do Not Reproduce Secondary Structures of

Eric J M Lang, Emily G Baker, Derek N Woolfson, Adrian J Mulholland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Solvent Model Benchmark for Molecular Dynamics of Glycosaminoglycans.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  15. Uncovering the Contributions of Charge Regulation to the Stability of Single Alpha Helices.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Simulation Reveals the Chameleonic Behavior of Macrocycles.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric J M LangCentre for Computational Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, U.K.
Emily G BakerSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1593-5525
Derek N WoolfsonSchool of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0394-3202
Adrian J MulhollandCentre for Computational Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-1015-4567

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We test a range of standard generalized Born (GB) models and protein force fields for a set of five experimentally characterized, designed peptides comprising alternating blocks of glutamate and lysine, which have been shown to differ significantly in α-helical content. Sixty-five combinations of force fields and GB models are evaluated in >800 μs of molecular dynamics simulations. GB models generally do not reproduce the experimentally observed α-helical content, and none perform well for all five peptides. These results illustrate that these models are not usefully predictive in this context. These peptides provide a useful test set for simulation methods.

Indexed as

LysinePeptidesComputer SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein Structure, SecondarySolventsThermodynamicsLysinePeptidesSolvents

Identifiers

PMID35687842
PMCPMC9281390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.