Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687814›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2022

Trends in Sexual Behavior and Sexually Transmitted Infections After Initiating Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Men Who Have Sex with Men from Amsterdam, the Netherlands: A Longitudinal Exposure-Matched Study.

Liza Coyer, Maria Prins, Udi Davidovich, Ward P H van Bilsen, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Elske Hoornenborg, Amy Matser, Anders Boyd

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liza CoyerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5830-2982
Maria PrinsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Udi DavidovichDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ward P H van BilsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8238-0638
Maarten F Schim van der LoeffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elske HoornenborgDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amy MatserDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anders BoydDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
GGD Amsterdam · NLStichting HIV Monitoring · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) initiating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may increase condomless anal sex (CAS) and number of partners, and, consequently, more often acquire sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Using data from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies, we compared sexual behavior and STI among MSM after PrEP-initiation with controls not initiating PrEP. The MSM reported on sexual behavior and were tested for HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis semi-annually. We matched MSM who initiated PrEP between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 1:1 to MSM who did not use time-dependent propensity scores based on age, sexual behavior, and STI. Primary end-points were number of casual partners, and proportion with CAS and receptive CAS (rCAS) with casual partners, sexualized drug use (SDU), any STI, and anal STI. We modeled end-points during the 4 years before and 2 years after PrEP-initiation or matched PrEP-initiation timepoint by using logistic regression (dichotomous end-points) or negative binomial regression (count end-point), adjusted for calendar year. Two hundred twenty-eight out of the 858 (26.6%) MSM initiated PrEP. We matched 198 out of 228 (86.8%) to a control. Before PrEP-initiation, end-points increased over time in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. The odds of CAS, rCAS, and anal STI were on average higher after than before PrEP-initiation in PrEP initiators, whereas after versus before differences were not observed in controls. After PrEP-initiation, PrEP initiators had statistically significantly more casual partners, and higher odds of CAS, rCAS, SDU, any STI, and anal STI than controls. These findings support frequent STI screening and counseling in MSM using PrEP.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesHIVHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNetherlandsSexual Behaviorhomosexualitymalemen who have sex with menpre-exposure prophylaxisprospective studiessexual behaviorsexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID35687814
PMCPMC9242711
OpenAlexW4281639318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.