Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687802›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Multifactorial influences underpinning a decision on COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers: a qualitative analysis.

Sungwon Yoon, Hendra Goh, David Matchar, Sharon C Sung, Elaine Lum, Sean Shao Wei Lam, Jenny Guek Hong Low, Terrance Chua, Nicholas Graves, Marcus Eh Ong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sungwon YoonHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-6097
Hendra GohHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
David MatcharHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Sharon C SungHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Elaine LumHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-3018
Sean Shao Wei LamDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Jenny Guek Hong LowDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Terrance ChuaDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nicholas GravesHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eh OngHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-7612
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGDuke Medical Center · USNational Heart Centre Singapore · SGSingHealth · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers (HCW) is essential for improved patient safety and resilience of health systems. Despite growing body of literature on the perceptions of COVID vaccines in HCWs, existing studies tend to focus on reasons for 'refusing' the vaccines, using surveys almost exclusively. To gain a more nuanced understanding, we explored multifactorial influences underpinning a decision on vaccination and suggestions for decision support to improve vaccine uptake among HCWs in the early phase of vaccination rollout. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with thirty-three HCWs in Singapore. Transcribed data was thematically analyzed. Decisions to accept vaccines were underpinned by a desire to protect patients primarily driven by a sense of professional integrity, collective responsibility to protect others, confidence in health authorities and a desire to return to a pre-pandemic way of life. However, there were prevailing concerns with respect to the vaccines, including long-term benefits, safety and efficacy, that hampered a decision. Inadequate information and social media representation of vaccination appeared to add to negative beliefs, impeding a decision to accept while low perceived susceptibility played a moderate role in the decision to delay or decline vaccination. Participants made valuable suggestions to bolster vaccination. Our findings support an approach to improving vaccine uptake in HCWs that features routine tracking and transparent updates on vaccination status, use of institutional platforms for sharing of experience, assuring contingency management plans and tailored communications to emphasize the duty of care and positive outlook associated with vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19decision-makinghealthcare workersqualitativevaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID35687802
PMCPMC9621075
OpenAlexW4281772655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.