Observational studyEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2022
Cognitive perspective of osteoporosis among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Malaysian case.
Observational study in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- To do one and to get more: Part I. Diabetes and bone.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Review
- Cognitive perspective of osteoporosis among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Malaysian case.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOsteoporosis and diabetes are highly prevalent diseases. In addition, there is increasing evidence that diabetes is a common risk factor for decreasing bone mineral density and developing osteoporosis and fractures. Data on bone abnormalities in T2DM patients appear to be contradictory and complex, and the exact underlying mechanism is still unclear. Hence, the aims of this study were to assess cognitive perspective of osteoporosis among type 2 diabetes mellitus.
methodsAn observational, cross-sectional study design was chosen, where data were collected using a self-report structured questionnaire including osteoporosis self-efficacy (OSES-M), knowledge Malay version. Quantitative ultrasound was used as prescreening tool for measuring bone health by applying T-score.
resultsThe results showed that about 231 (51.30%) were males. The average age of the DM patients was 62.67 ± 9.24 years. Moreover, the majority of T2DM patient (343, 76.20%) had poor glycaemic control. The mean ± SD OSES-M total score, OSES-M Exercise subscale and OSES-M Calcium subscale were 731.26 ± 209.83, 357.55 ± 121.23 and 373.71 ± 118.91, respectively. Overall, participants expressed a low self-efficacy for both exercise and calcium intake experiences. In addition, a significant and positive correlation was found between OSES-M and OKT-M total scores (n = 450, r
conclusionOverall, participants expressed a low self-efficacy for both exercise and calcium intake experiences. In addition, only 28.70% of the study population was found to have high OSES-M level. Thus, self-efficacy is important and effective determinants for gaining positive health behaviours towards osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.