Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687700›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2022

Pancreatic cancer, radiomics and artificial intelligence.

Luis Marti-Bonmati, Leonor Cerdá-Alberich, Alexandre Pérez-Girbés, Roberto Díaz Beveridge, Eva Montalvá Orón, Judith Pérez Rojas, Angel Alberich-Bayarri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Understanding the Conundrum of Pancreatic Cancer in the Omics Sciences Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis Marti-BonmatiGIBI230 Research Group on Biomedical Imaging, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8234-010X
Leonor Cerdá-AlberichGIBI230 Research Group on Biomedical Imaging, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Alexandre Pérez-GirbésDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Roberto Díaz BeveridgeDepartment of Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Eva Montalvá OrónDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Judith Pérez RojasDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Angel Alberich-BayarriGIBI230 Research Group on Biomedical Imaging, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESCenter For Biomarker Research In Medicine · ATInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are generally classified into four categories based on contrast-enhanced CT at diagnosis: resectable, borderline resectable, unresectable, and metastatic disease. In the initial grading and staging of PDAC, structured radiological templates are useful but limited, as there is a need to define the aggressiveness and microscopic disease stage of these tumours to ensure adequate treatment allocation. Quantitative imaging analysis allows radiomics and dynamic imaging features to provide information of clinical outcomes, and to construct clinical models based on radiomics signatures or imaging phenotypes. These quantitative features may be used as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in clinical decision-making, enabling personalised management of advanced PDAC. Deep learning and convolutional neural networks also provide high level bioinformatics tools that can help define features associated with a given aspect of PDAC biology and aggressiveness, paving the way to define outcomes based on these features. Thus, the prediction of tumour phenotype, treatment response and patient prognosis may be feasible by using such comprehensive and integrated radiomics models. Despite these promising results, quantitative imaging is not ready for clinical implementation in PDAC. Limitations include the instability of metrics and lack of external validation. Large properly annotated datasets, including relevant semantic features (demographics, blood markers, genomics), image harmonisation, robust radiomics analysis, clinically significant tasks as outputs, comparisons with gold-standards (such as TNM or pretreatment classifications) and fully independent validation cohorts, will be required for the development of trustworthy radiomics and artificial intelligence solutions to predict PDAC aggressiveness in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35687700
PMCPMC10996946
OpenAlexW4281876958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.