ReviewThe British journal of radiology2022
Pancreatic cancer, radiomics and artificial intelligence.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Framework for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer Using Multi-modal Medical Imaging Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Can Machine Learning Predict Metastatic Sites in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma? A Radiomic Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Review
- Research progress and trends on PET/CT imaging of pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Selection of Patients and Surgical Technique.Digestive surgery · 2026Review
- A CT-Based Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram for Early Recurrence Prediction in Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive insights into pancreatic cancer treatment approaches and cutting-edge nanocarrier solutions: from pathology to nanomedicine.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection for Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Updates, Trends, and Future Considerations.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Developing and validating a computed tomography radiomics strategy to predict lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography-Based Habitat Analysis for Prognostic Stratification in Colorectal Liver Metastases.Cancer innovation · 2025Article
- A semi-supervised convolutional neural network for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on EUS-FNA cytological images.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- A bibliometric analysis of the advance of artificial intelligence in medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding the Conundrum of Pancreatic Cancer in the Omics Sciences Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Imaging Modalities and the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Analyzing CT and MRI Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Deep Learning Applications in Pancreatic Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Limited impact of discretization/interpolation parameters on the predictive power of CT radiomic features in a surgical cohort of pancreatic cancer patients.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- CT Radiomics and Whole Genome Sequencing in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Predictive Radiogenomics Modeling.Cancers · 2022Article
- Pancreatic cancer grading in pathological images using deep learning convolutional neural networks.F1000Research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are generally classified into four categories based on contrast-enhanced CT at diagnosis: resectable, borderline resectable, unresectable, and metastatic disease. In the initial grading and staging of PDAC, structured radiological templates are useful but limited, as there is a need to define the aggressiveness and microscopic disease stage of these tumours to ensure adequate treatment allocation. Quantitative imaging analysis allows radiomics and dynamic imaging features to provide information of clinical outcomes, and to construct clinical models based on radiomics signatures or imaging phenotypes. These quantitative features may be used as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in clinical decision-making, enabling personalised management of advanced PDAC. Deep learning and convolutional neural networks also provide high level bioinformatics tools that can help define features associated with a given aspect of PDAC biology and aggressiveness, paving the way to define outcomes based on these features. Thus, the prediction of tumour phenotype, treatment response and patient prognosis may be feasible by using such comprehensive and integrated radiomics models. Despite these promising results, quantitative imaging is not ready for clinical implementation in PDAC. Limitations include the instability of metrics and lack of external validation. Large properly annotated datasets, including relevant semantic features (demographics, blood markers, genomics), image harmonisation, robust radiomics analysis, clinically significant tasks as outputs, comparisons with gold-standards (such as TNM or pretreatment classifications) and fully independent validation cohorts, will be required for the development of trustworthy radiomics and artificial intelligence solutions to predict PDAC aggressiveness in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.