Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687666›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2022

3D Culture Modeling of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells in Additive Manufactured Scaffolds.

Afroditi Nanou, Ivan Lorenzo-Moldero, Kyriakos D Gazouleas, Barbara Cortese, Lorenzo Moroni

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. 3D bioprinting innovations: a new frontier in breast cancer research.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A 3D-Printable Cell Array for In Vitro Breast Cancer Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Afroditi NanouTissue Regeneration Department, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 ND Enschede, The Netherlands.
Ivan Lorenzo-MolderoTissue Regeneration Department, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 ND Enschede, The Netherlands.
Kyriakos D GazouleasTissue Regeneration Department, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 ND Enschede, The Netherlands.
Barbara CorteseNational Research Council-Nanotechnology Institute (CNR Nanotec), 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8667-7255
Lorenzo MoroniTissue Regeneration Department, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 ND Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-6025
Maastricht University · NLUniversity of Twente · NLIstituto Nanoscienze · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer biology research is increasingly moving toward innovative

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTissue ScaffoldsCell ProliferationFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenLamin Type AKi-67 AntigenLamin Type Abreast cancerscaffoldsthree-dimensional bioprintingtissue engineeringtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35687666
PMCPMC9227707
OpenAlexW4281654167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.