Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687610›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Personalized care planning and shared decision making in collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review.

Matthew Menear, Ariane Girard, Michèle Dugas, Michel Gervais, Michel Gilbert, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Shared decision-making in depression: From a generalized ethical imperative to a personalized approach? A narrative review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Injury patterns of suicide attempts in the head and neck area-a retrospective analysis over 15 years.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew MenearVITAM Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-6574
Ariane GirardVITAM Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Michèle DugasVITAM Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-6231
Michel GervaisCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Michel GilbertCentre National d'Excellence en Santé Mentale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonVITAM Research Centre for Sustainable Health, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Université Laval · CACentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux · CAInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec · CA

Funding

CIHR 201505KRS-350972-KRS-CFBA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaborative care is an evidence-based approach to improving outcomes for common mental disorders in primary care. Efforts are underway to broadly implement the collaborative care model, yet the extent to which this model promotes person-centered mental health care has been little studied. The aim of this study was to describe practices related to two patient and family engagement strategies-personalized care planning and shared decision making-within collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders in primary care.

methodsWe conducted an update of a 2012 Cochrane review, which involved searches in Cochrane CCDAN and CINAHL databases, complemented by additional database, trial registry, and cluster searches. We included programs evaluated in a clinical trials targeting adults or youth diagnosed with depressive or anxiety disorders, as well as sibling reports related to these trials. Pairs of reviewers working independently selected the studies and data extraction for engagement strategies was guided by a codebook. We used narrative synthesis to report on findings.

resultsIn total, 150 collaborative care programs were analyzed. The synthesis showed that personalized care planning or shared decision making were practiced in fewer than half of programs. Practices related to personalized care planning, and to a lesser extent shared decision making, involved multiple members of the collaborative care team, with care managers playing a pivotal role in supporting patient and family engagement. Opportunities for quality improvement were identified, including fostering greater patient involvement in collaborative goal setting and integrating training and decision aids to promote shared decision making.

conclusionThis review suggests that personalized care planning and shared decision making could be more fully integrated within collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders. Their absence in some programs is a missed opportunity to spread person-centered mental health practices in primary care.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedDepressionAdolescentAdultAnxiety DisordersDecision MakingHumansMental HealthPatient Participation

Identifiers

PMID35687610
PMCPMC9187074
OpenAlexW4281628492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.