Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687580›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Effectiveness of a Second Dose of an mRNA Vaccine Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron Infection in Individuals Previously Infected by Other Variants.

Susana Monge, Ayelén Rojas-Benedicto, Carmen Olmedo, Elisa Martín-Merino, Clara Mazagatos, Aurora Limia, María José Sierra, Amparo Larrauri, Miguel A Hernán, IBERCovid

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Susana MongeDepartment of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-3012
Ayelén Rojas-BenedictoDepartment of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen OlmedoVaccines Division, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.
Elisa Martín-MerinoSpanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain.
Clara MazagatosDepartment of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Aurora LimiaVaccines Division, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.
María José SierraCIBER on Infectious Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
Amparo LarrauriDepartment of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel A HernánCAUSALab and Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
IBERCovid
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESMinistry of Health · ESAgencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios · ESHarvard University · USUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-dose vaccination was widely recommended in the pre-Omicron era for persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of a second vaccine dose in this group in the Omicron era is unknown.

methodsWe linked nationwide population registries in Spain to identify community-dwelling individuals aged 18-64, with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test before single-dose mRNA vaccination (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2). Every day between 3 January and 6 February 2022 we matched 1:1 individuals receiving a second mRNA vaccine dose and controls on sex, age, province, first dose type and time, month of primary infection, and number of previous tests. We then estimated Kaplan-Meier risks of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. We performed a similar analysis in a Delta-dominant period, between 19 July and 30 November 2021.

resultsIn the Omicron period, estimated effectiveness (95% CI) of a second dose was 62.2% (58.2-66.4%) 7-34 days after administration, similar across groups defined by age, sex, type of first vaccine, and time since the first dose. Estimated effectiveness was 65.4% (61.1-69.9%) for mRNA-1273 and 52.0% (41.8-63.1%) for BNT162b2. Estimated effectiveness was 78.5% (67.4-89.9%), 66.1% (54.9-77.5%), and 60.2% (55.5-64.8%) when primary infection had occurred in the Delta, Alpha, and pre-Alpha periods, respectively. In the Delta period, the estimated effectiveness of a second dose was 8.8% (-55.3% to 81.1%).

conclusionsOur results suggest that, over 1 month after administration, a second dose of mRNA vaccine increases protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection with the Omicron variant among individuals with single-dose vaccination and previously infected with another variant.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-22019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineHumansmRNA VaccinesReinfection2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccinemRNA VaccinesCOVID-19effectivenessOmicronSARS-CoV-2vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35687580
PMCPMC9214148
OpenAlexW4281741723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.