Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687563›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Factors associated with anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein antibody titer and neutralizing activity among healthcare workers following vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine.

Yurie Kobashi, Yuzo Shimazu, Takeshi Kawamura, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Fumiya Omata, Yudai Kaneko, Tatsuhiko Kodama, Masaharu Tsubokura

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yurie KobashiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hirata Central Hospital, Hirata, Ishikawa District, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3442-3779
Yuzo ShimazuDepartment of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan.
Takeshi KawamuraProteomics Laboratory, Isotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-6968
Yoshitaka NishikawaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hirata Central Hospital, Hirata, Ishikawa District, Fukushima, Japan.
Fumiya OmataDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hirata Central Hospital, Hirata, Ishikawa District, Fukushima, Japan.
Yudai KanekoLaboratory for Systems Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuhiko KodamaLaboratory for Systems Biology and Medicine, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaharu TsubokuraDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hirata Central Hospital, Hirata, Ishikawa District, Fukushima, Japan.
Fukushima Medical University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPMurata (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the increase in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S1) protein and neutralizing antibody titer following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This observational study was conducted among healthcare workers working for a private hospital group in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Two blood samples were obtained from each participant. The first sample was obtained before the first dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, and a second sample was obtained approximately 6 weeks later. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1) protein, immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody against SARS-CoV-2 N-protein, and neutralizing activity were measured using the chemiluminescent immunoassay with iFlash 3000. A total of 231 healthcare workers who agreed to participate, and were negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies at enrollment, were included in the analysis. All participants had elevated IgG antibodies and neutralizing activity above the cutoff values. A total of 174 (75.3%) and 208 (90.0%) participants experienced adverse reactions after the first and second vaccine doses, respectively. Younger age, female sex, not taking immunosuppressive or antipyretic analgesic medication regularly, a lack of local adverse reactions after the first dose, and the presence of adverse reactions (fever, muscle, and joint pain) after the second dose were associated with higher IgG antibody titers and neutralizing activity. Intake of analgesic antipyretic for adverse reactions to vaccines was not significantly associated with antibody and neutralizing activity titer production. Immune responses after vaccination may differ among individuals, and continued countermeasures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection are vital.

Indexed as

AntipyreticsCOVID-19Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntipyreticsBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35687563
PMCPMC9187057
OpenAlexW4281649955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.