Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35687393›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Machine Learning-Based Text Analysis to Predict Severely Injured Patients in Emergency Medical Dispatch: Model Development and Validation.

Kuan-Chen Chin, Yu-Chia Cheng, Jen-Tang Sun, Chih-Yen Ou, Chun-Hua Hu, Ming-Chi Tsai, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Wen-Chu Chiang, Albert Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kuan-Chen Chin *Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-2774
Yu-Chia Cheng *Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3158-4793
Jen-Tang SunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2628-9917
Chih-Yen OuDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0437-0642
Chun-Hua HuEmergency Medical Service Division, Taipei City Fire Department, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6678-3162
Ming-Chi TsaiEmergency Medical Service Division, Taipei City Fire Department, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7739-5264
Matthew Huei-Ming MaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-9984
Wen-Chu Chiang *Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8620-7982
Albert Y Chen *Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6702-9834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly recognition of severely injured patients in prehospital settings is of paramount importance for timely treatment and transportation of patients to further treatment facilities. The dispatching accuracy has seldom been addressed in previous studies.

objectiveIn this study, we aimed to build a machine learning-based model through text mining of emergency calls for the automated identification of severely injured patients after a road accident.

methodsAudio recordings of road accidents in Taipei City, Taiwan, in 2018 were obtained and randomly sampled. Data on call transfers or non-Mandarin speeches were excluded. To predict cases of severe trauma identified on-site by emergency medical technicians, all included cases were evaluated by both humans (6 dispatchers) and a machine learning model, that is, a prehospital-activated major trauma (PAMT) model. The PAMT model was developed using term frequency-inverse document frequency, rule-based classification, and a Bernoulli naïve Bayes classifier. Repeated random subsampling cross-validation was applied to evaluate the robustness of the model. The prediction performance of dispatchers and the PAMT model, in severe cases, was compared. Performance was indicated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy.

resultsAlthough the mean sensitivity and negative predictive value obtained by the PAMT model were higher than those of dispatchers, they obtained higher mean specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy. The mean accuracy of the PAMT model, from certainty level 0 (lowest certainty) to level 6 (highest certainty), was higher except for levels 5 and 6. The overall performances of the dispatchers and the PAMT model were similar; however, the PAMT model had higher accuracy in cases where the dispatchers were less certain of their judgments.

conclusionsA machine learning-based model, called the PAMT model, was developed to predict severe road accident trauma. The results of our study suggest that the accuracy of the PAMT model is not superior to that of the participating dispatchers; however, it may assist dispatchers when they lack confidence while making a judgment.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical ServicesBayes TheoremEmergency Medical Service Communication SystemsHumansMachine LearningBernoulli naïve Bayesdispatcheremergency medical dispatchemergency medical servicefrequency–inverse document frequencymachine learningtrauma

Identifiers

PMID35687393
PMCPMC9233260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.