ArticleJAMA network open2022
A Prehospital Triage System to Detect Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Using Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic test accuracy of machine learning algorithms for the detection intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Development of a peripheral blood transcriptomic gene signature to predict bronchopulmonary dysplasia.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2023Trial
- Limited Predictability of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage from Routine Pre-CT Clinical Variables in Older Adults with Low-Energy Falls: A Systematic Benchmarking Study in a Retrospective Bicentric Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Prehospital real-time AI for trauma mortality prediction: a multi-institutional and multi-national validation study.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Machine learning analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and their associations with hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the probability of death after surgical evacuation for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance and clinical applications of artificial intelligence for intracranial bleeding detection: A meta-analysis.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Delirium Risk in Older Patients with Dementia: Risk Factors Identification.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
- Sample Size Requirements for Popular Classification Algorithms in Tabular Clinical Data: Empirical Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Potential Applications and Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Traumatic Brain Injury Management.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- Predicting 1 year readmission for heart failure: A comparative study of machine learning and the LACE index.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Neurocritical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury : Past, Present and Future.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based predictive model for the development of thrombolysis resistance in patients with acute ischemic stroke.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Drinking from the Holy Grail-Does a Perfect Triage System Exist? And Where to Look for It?Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Identifying potential (re)hemorrhage among sporadic cerebral cavernous malformations using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Vision Transformer-based Decision Support for Neurosurgical Intervention in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: Automated Surgical Intervention Support Tool.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Utilization of interpretable machine learning model to forecast the risk of major adverse kidney events in elderly patients in critical care.Renal failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: An adequate system for triaging patients with head trauma in prehospital settings and choosing optimal medical institutions is essential for improving the prognosis of these patients. To our knowledge, there has been no established way to stratify these patients based on their head trauma severity that can be used by ambulance crews at an injury site. Objectives: To develop a prehospital triage system to stratify patients with head trauma according to trauma severity by using several machine learning techniques and to evaluate the predictive accuracy of these techniques. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing the electronic medical records of consecutive patients who were transported to Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital in Japan from April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2021. Patients younger than 16 years with cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival or with a significant amount of missing data were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Machine learning-based prediction models to detect the presence of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were constructed. The predictive accuracy of the models was evaluated with the area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC), area under the precision recall curve (PR-AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and other representative statistics. Results: A total of 2123 patients (1527 male patients [71.9%]; mean [SD] age, 57.6 [19.8] years) with head trauma were enrolled in this study. Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was detected in 258 patients (12.2%). Among several machine learning algorithms, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieved the mean (SD) highest ROC-AUC (0.78 [0.02]) and PR-AUC (0.46 [0.01]) in cross-validation studies. In the testing set, the ROC-AUC was 0.80, the sensitivity was 74.0% (95% CI, 59.7%-85.4%), and the specificity was 74.9% (95% CI, 70.2%-79.3%). The prediction model using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, which was calculated after consultation with physicians, had a sensitivity of 72.0% (95% CI, 57.5%-83.8%) and a specificity of 73.3% (95% CI, 68.7%-77.7%). The McNemar test revealed no statistically significant differences between the XGBoost algorithm and the NICE guidelines for sensitivity or specificity (P = .80 and P = .55, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the prediction model achieved a comparatively accurate performance in detecting traumatic intracranial hemorrhage using only the simple pretransportation information from the patient. Further validation with a prospective multicenter data set is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.