ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2022
Transplantation of encapsulated autologous olfactory ensheathing cell populations expressing chondroitinase for spinal cord injury: A safety and feasibility study in companion dogs.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chondroitinase ABC in spinal cord injury: advances in delivery strategies and therapeutic synergies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Approach to Small Animal Neurorehabilitation by Locomotor Training: An Update.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Transplantation of encapsulated autologous olfactory ensheathing cell populations expressing chondroitinase for spinal cord injury: A safety and feasibility study in companion dogs.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) can cause irreversible paralysis, with no regenerative treatment clinically available. Dogs with natural SCI present an established model and can facilitate translation of experimental findings in rodents to people. We conducted a prospective, single arm clinical safety study in companion dogs with chronic SCI to characterize the feasibility of intraspinal transplantation of hydrogel-encapsulated autologous mucosal olfactory ensheathing cell (mOEC) populations expressing chondroitinase ABC (chABC). mOECs and chABC are both promising therapies for SCI, and mOECs expressing chABC drive greater voluntary motor recovery than mOECs alone after SCI in rats. Canine mOECs encapsulated in collagen hydrogel can be matched in stiffness to canine SCI. Four dogs with complete and chronic loss of function caudal to a thoraco-lumbar lesion were recruited. After baseline measures, olfactory mucosal biopsy was performed and autologous mOECs cultured and transduced to express chABC, then hydrogel-encapsulated and percutaneously injected into the spinal cord. Dogs were monitored for 6 months with repeat clinical examinations, spinal MRI, kinematic gait and von Frey assessment. No adverse effects or significant changes on neurological examination were detected. MRI revealed large and variable lesions, with no spinal cord compression or ischemia visible after hydrogel transplantation. Owners reported increased pelvic-limb reflexes with one dog able to take 2-3 unsupported steps, but gait-scoring and kinematic analysis showed no significant improvements. This novel combination approach to regeneration after SCI is therefore feasible and safe in paraplegic dogs in a clinical setting. A randomised-controlled trial in this translational model is proposed to test efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.