Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35686572›Full record

Trial reportEmerging microbes & infections2022

Efficacy of heterologous boosting against SARS-CoV-2 using a recombinant interferon-armed fusion protein vaccine (V-01): a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled phase III trial.

Xuan-Yi Wang, Syed Faisal Mahmood, Fang Jin, Wee Kooi Cheah, Muhammad Ahmad, Mian Amjad Sohail, Waheed Ahmad, Vijaya K Suppan, Muneeba Ahsan Sayeed, Shobha Luxmi and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Emerging microbes & infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Xuan-Yi WangShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6398-9184
Syed Faisal MahmoodHospital of Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fang JinState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Wee Kooi CheahDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Research Centre, Taiping Hospital, Perak, Malaysia.
Muhammad AhmadPulmonology & Critical care, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mian Amjad SohailShifa International Hospitals Ltd, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Waheed AhmadAvicenna Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Vijaya K SuppanClinical Research Center, Sultan Abdul Halim Hospital, Kedah, Malaysia.
Muneeba Ahsan SayeedDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Sindh Infectious Diseases Hospital and Research Centre, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shobha LuxmiDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aik-Howe TeoPenang General Hospital and Info Kinetics Clinical Research Centre, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Li Yuan LeeCRC Seri Manjung Hospital, Perak, Malaysia.
Yang-Yang QiShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-9675
Rong-Juan PeiWuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Wei DengGuangzhou Joincare Respiratory Medicine Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhong-Hui XuLivzon Mabpharm Inc., Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Ming YangLivzon Mabpharm Inc., Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.
Yan ZhangLivzon Mabpharm Inc., Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.
Wu-Xiang GuanWuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Xiong YuJoincare Pharmaceutical Group Industry Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNDow University of Health Sciences · PKFudan University · CNGuangzhou Experimental Station · CNAga Khan Hospital, Kisumu · KEAllama Iqbal Medical College · PKChina National Pharmaceutical Group Corporation (China) · CNHospital Pulau Pinang · MYSerdang Hospital · MYShifa International Hospital · PKSultan Abdul Halim Hospital · MYTaiping Hospital · MYUniversity of Central Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waning of neutralizing titres along with decline of protection efficacy after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccines was observed, including China-made inactivated vaccines. Efficacy of a heterologous boosting using one dose of a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 fusion protein vaccine (V-01) in inactivated vaccine-primed population was studied, aimed to restore the immunity. A randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled phase III trial was conducted in healthy people aged 18 years or older in Pakistan and Malaysia. Each eligible participant received one dose of the V-01 vaccine developed by Livzon Mabpharm Inc. or placebo within the 3-6 months after the two-dose primary regimen, and was monitored for safety and efficacy. The primary endpoint was protection against confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. A total of 10,218 participants were randomly assigned to receive a vaccine or placebo. Virus-neutralizing antibodies were assessed in 419 participants. A dramatic increase (11.3-fold; 128.3-1452.8) of neutralizing titres was measured in the V-01 group at 14 days after the booster. Over two months of surveillance, vaccine efficacy was 47.8% (95%CI: 22.6-64.7) according to the intention-to-treat principle. The most common adverse events were transient, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fever, headache, and fatigue. Serious adverse events occurred almost equally in V-01 (0.12%) and placebo (0.16%) groups. The heterologous boosting with the V-01 vaccine was safe and efficacious, which could elicit robust humoral immunity under the epidemic of the Omicron variant.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunization, SecondarySARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInterferonsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesInterferonsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVaccines, Inactivatedclinical trialEfficacyfusion proteinheterologous boostingsubunit vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35686572
PMCPMC9347473
OpenAlexW4281716282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.