Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35686568›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2022

Impact of stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions applied during the second and third COVID-19 epidemic waves in Portugal, 9 November 2020 to 10 February 2021: an ecological study.

Ana Rita Torres, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Mafalda Sousa-Uva, Irina Kislaya, Susana Silva, Liliana Antunes, Carlos Dias, Baltazar Nunes

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Rita TorresDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Paula RodriguesDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mafalda Sousa-UvaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Irina KislayaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Susana SilvaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Liliana AntunesDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carlos DiasDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Baltazar NunesDepartment of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundNon-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were implemented worldwide to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2.AimTo evaluate the impact of tiered NPIs and a nationwide lockdown on reduction of COVID-19 incidence during the second and third epidemic waves in Portugal.MethodsSurveillance data on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were used to conduct an interrupted time series analysis to estimate changes in daily incidence during a second wave tiered NPI period (9 November-18 December 2020), and a third wave lockdown period without (15-21 January 2021) and with school closure (22 January-10 February 2021).ResultsSignificant changes in trends were observed for the overall incidence rate; declining trends were observed for tiered NPIs (-1.9% per day; incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.981; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.973-0.989) and a lockdown period without (-3.4% per day; IRR: 0.966; 95% CI: 0.935-0.998) and with school closure (-10.3% per day, IRR: 0.897; 95% CI: 0.846-0.951). Absolute effects associated with tiered NPIs and a lockdown on a subsequent 14-day period yielded 137 cases and 437 cases per 100,000 population potentially averted, respectively.ConclusionOur results indicate that tiered NPIs implemented during the second wave caused a decline in COVID-19 incidence, although modest. Moreover, a third wave lockdown without school closure was effective in reducing COVID-19 incidence, but the addition of school closure provided the strongest effect. These findings emphasise the importance of early and assertive decision-making to control the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPortugalSARS-CoV-2COVID-19NPIsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35686568
PMCPMC9198658
OpenAlexW4282029912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.