Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35686446›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2022

Searching for bridges between psychopathology and real-world functioning in first-episode psychosis: A network analysis from the OPTiMiSE trial.

Francesco Dal Santo, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, María Paz García-Portilla, Leticia González-Blanco, Pilar A Sáiz, Silvana Galderisi, Giulia Maria Giordano, Julio Bobes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco Dal SantoÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-6443
Eduardo Fonseca-PedreroCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
María Paz García-PortillaÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3643-1622
Leticia González-BlancoÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Pilar A SáizÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5705-4523
Silvana GalderisiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1592-7656
Giulia Maria GiordanoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Julio BobesÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2187-4033
Universidad de Oviedo · ESUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversidad de La Rioja · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNetwork analysis has been used to explore the interplay between psychopathology and functioning in psychosis, but no study has used dedicated statistical techniques to focus on the bridge symptoms connecting these domains. The current study aims to estimate the network of depressive, negative, and positive symptoms, general psychopathology, and real-world functioning in people with first-episode schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder, focusing on bridge nodes.

methodsBaseline data from the OPTiMiSE trial were analyzed. The sample included 446 participants (age 40.0 ± 10.9 years, 70% males). The network was estimated with a Gaussian graphical model, using scores on individual items of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), the Calgary depression scale for schizophrenia, and the personal and social performance scale. Stability, strength centrality, expected influence (EI), predictability, and bridge centrality statistics were computed. The top 20% scoring nodes on bridge strength were selected as bridge nodes.

resultsNodes from different rating scales assessing similar psychopathological and functioning constructs tended to cluster together in the estimated network. The most central nodes (EI) were Delusions, Emotional Withdrawal, Depression, and Depressed Mood. Bridge nodes included Depression, Conceptual Disorganization, Active Social Avoidance, Delusions, Stereotyped Thinking, Poor Impulse Control, Guilty Feelings, Unusual Thought Content, and Hostility. Most of the bridge nodes belonged to the general psychopathology subscale of the PANSS. Depression (G6) was the bridge node with the highest value.

conclusionsThe current study provides novel insights for understanding the complex phenotype of psychotic disorders and the mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of comorbidity and functional impairment after psychosis onset.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaAdultClinical Trials as TopicCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychopathologyfirst-episode psychosisnetwork analysispsychopathologyreal-world functioningschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID35686446
PMCPMC9251819
OpenAlexW4281639261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.