ArticleCureus2022
Fusion of the Greater and Suboccipital Nerves: A Case Report With Application to Patients With Occipital Neuralgia.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical presentations of occipital neuralgia might have an anatomical cause. Therefore, a better understanding of variant anatomy in this region can help physicians who treat such patients. During the dissection of the suboccipital region in an 83-year-old at-death male cadaver, an unusual finding was noted between the suboccipital and greater occipital nerves. No branches from this segment of the suboccipital nerve were identified. Therefore, initially, the suboccipital muscles were thought to be innervated not by the suboccipital nerve but rather by branches of the medial (greater occipital nerve) and lateral branches of the C2 dorsal ramus. However, with microdissection, these fibers were found to ascend with the medial branch of the C2 ramus (greater occipital nerve) and to distribute fibers to the rectus capitis minor and major and then continue with the greater occipital nerve to the skin over the occiput. No fibers from the suboccipital nerve traveled to the C2 spinal nerve or its lateral branch. The lateral part of the dorsal ramus of C2 innervated the obliquus capitis superior and obliquus capitis inferior. Additionally, a long slender branch from the lateral branch of the C2 dorsal ramus traveled medially to innervate the skin over the C2 spinous process. This case demonstrates that some fibers in the greater occipital nerve (C2), both cutaneous and motor, can be derived from the suboccipital nerve (C1). This information can help in diagnosing some patients with atypical presentations and can help better target all involved occipital nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.