Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35686182›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Detection of Depression and Suicide Risk Based on Text From Clinical Interviews Using Machine Learning: Possibility of a New Objective Diagnostic Marker.

Daun Shin, Kyungdo Kim, Seung-Bo Lee, Changwoo Lee, Ye Seul Bae, Won Ik Cho, Min Ji Kim, C Hyung Keun Park, Eui Kyu Chie, Nam Soo Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daun ShinDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyungdo KimTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine & Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Bo LeeDepartment of Medical Information, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Changwoo LeeOffice of Hospital Information, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ye Seul BaeOffice of Hospital Information, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Won Ik ChoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and INMC, Seoul National University College of Engineering, Seoul, South Korea.
Min Ji KimDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
C Hyung Keun ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Eui Kyu ChieOffice of Hospital Information, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Nam Soo KimDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and INMC, Seoul National University College of Engineering, Seoul, South Korea.
Yong Min AhnDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRAsan Medical Center · KRKeimyung University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression and suicide are critical social problems worldwide, but tools to objectively diagnose them are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to diagnose depression through machine learning and determine whether it is possible to identify groups at high risk of suicide through words spoken by the participants in a semi-structured interview. Methods: A total of 83 healthy and 83 depressed patients were recruited. All participants were recorded during the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Through the suicide risk assessment from the interview items, participants with depression were classified into high-suicide-risk (31 participants) and low-suicide-risk (52 participants) groups. The recording was transcribed into text after only the words uttered by the participant were extracted. In addition, all participants were evaluated for depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and impulsivity. The chi-square test and student's Results: A total of 21,376 words were extracted from all participants and the model for diagnosing patients with depression based on this text confirmed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.905, a sensitivity of 0.699, and a specificity of 0.964. In the model that distinguished the two groups using statistically significant demographic variables, the AUC was only 0.761. The DeLong test result ( Conclusion: The possibility of diagnosing depression using interview text was confirmed; regarding suicide risk, the diagnosis accuracy increased when demographic variables were incorporated. Therefore, participants' words during an interview show significant potential as an objective and diagnostic marker through machine learning.

Indexed as

depressionmachine learningobjective markersuicide risktext analysis

Identifiers

PMID35686182
PMCPMC9170939
OpenAlexW4281382989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.