ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2022
Continual Sequence Modeling With Predictive Coding.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrinsic stabilization of synaptic plasticity improves learning and robustness in artificial neural networks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Guided Tutorial on Modelling Human Event-Related Potentials with Recurrent Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Digital computing through randomness and order in neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have been proved very successful at modeling sequential data such as language or motions. However, these successes rely on the use of the backpropagation through time (BPTT) algorithm, batch training, and the hypothesis that all the training data are available at the same time. In contrast, the field of developmental robotics aims at uncovering lifelong learning mechanisms that could allow embodied machines to learn and stabilize knowledge in continuously evolving environments. In this article, we investigate different RNN designs and learning methods, that we evaluate in a continual learning setting. The generative modeling task consists in learning to generate 20 continuous trajectories that are presented sequentially to the learning algorithms. Each method is evaluated according to the average prediction error over the 20 trajectories obtained after complete training. This study focuses on learning algorithms with low memory requirements, that do not need to store past information to update their parameters. Our experiments identify two approaches especially fit for this task: conceptors and predictive coding. We suggest combining these two mechanisms into a new proposed model that we label PC-Conceptors that outperforms the other methods presented in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.