Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35686113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Extent of Neck Dissection and Cervical Lymph Node Involvement in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Philipp Thoenissen, Anja Heselich, Stefanie Deeg, Sarah Al-Maawi, Anna Tanneberger, Robert Sader, Shahram Ghanaati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp ThoenissenClinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Anja HeselichClinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Stefanie DeegClinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Sarah Al-MaawiClinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Anna TannebergerClinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Robert SaderClinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Shahram GhanaatiClinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
University Hospital Frankfurt · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tumor resection combined with neck dissection (ND) or radiotherapy are established methods for the treatment of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the extent of ND can lead to postoperative complications. Therefore, for the first time, this study aims to identify lymph node involvement in OSCC performed in a bilateral systematic approach based on oncologic board meetings relying on presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: In a retrospective single-center study, patients with primary OSCC resection and systematic ND performed in 4 different manners (MRND III bilateral, MRND III left and SND right, MRND III right, SND left, and SND bilateral) were examined. Lymph node involvement allocated to levels was evaluated depending on primary localization and T-stage. Results: A total of 177 consecutive patients (mean age 63.64; 92 female, male 85) were enrolled in this study. A total of 38.98% showed cervical lymph node involvement, and metastases were found in levels 1-4. The distribution of positive lymph node metastases (n=190 LNs) was 39.47% in level 1, 38.95% in level 2, 10.53% in level 3, and 11.05% in level 4. Discussion: In a cohort of OSCC patients with systematic bilateral ND, levels 1 and 2 had positive lymph node involvement, and no lymph node involvement was seen at level 5. Without any clinical or imaging suspicion, ND expanding 5-level MRND should be avoided regardless of the primary tumor localization, T-stage and intraoperative proof of cervical metastases.

Indexed as

cervical metastasisfollow upMRND (modified radical neck dissection)neck dissection (ND)OSCC (oral squamous cell carcinoma)SND (selective neck dissection)

Identifiers

PMID35686113
PMCPMC9172998
OpenAlexW4281387285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.