ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Extent of Neck Dissection and Cervical Lymph Node Involvement in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma: reassessing its role in contemporary practice.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Neck dissection improves the prognosis of patients with early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tumor resection combined with neck dissection (ND) or radiotherapy are established methods for the treatment of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the extent of ND can lead to postoperative complications. Therefore, for the first time, this study aims to identify lymph node involvement in OSCC performed in a bilateral systematic approach based on oncologic board meetings relying on presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: In a retrospective single-center study, patients with primary OSCC resection and systematic ND performed in 4 different manners (MRND III bilateral, MRND III left and SND right, MRND III right, SND left, and SND bilateral) were examined. Lymph node involvement allocated to levels was evaluated depending on primary localization and T-stage. Results: A total of 177 consecutive patients (mean age 63.64; 92 female, male 85) were enrolled in this study. A total of 38.98% showed cervical lymph node involvement, and metastases were found in levels 1-4. The distribution of positive lymph node metastases (n=190 LNs) was 39.47% in level 1, 38.95% in level 2, 10.53% in level 3, and 11.05% in level 4. Discussion: In a cohort of OSCC patients with systematic bilateral ND, levels 1 and 2 had positive lymph node involvement, and no lymph node involvement was seen at level 5. Without any clinical or imaging suspicion, ND expanding 5-level MRND should be avoided regardless of the primary tumor localization, T-stage and intraoperative proof of cervical metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.