Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685983›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2022

Prognostic Factors of Mid- to Long-term Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscal Tears.

Sung Yup Hong, Woosol Han, Junhyuk Jang, Joonhee Lee, Du Hyun Ro, Myung Chul Lee, Hyuk-Soo Han

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Can we Predict the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Achieving high accuracy in meniscus tear detection using advanced deep learning models with a relatively small data set.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sung Yup HongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-2984
Woosol HanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-1798
Junhyuk JangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-1700
Joonhee LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, CM Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7818-5194
Du Hyun RoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-908X
Myung Chul LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-1573
Hyuk-Soo HanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1229-8863
Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRCM Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgroud: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) continues to be the popular treatment for meniscal tears, but recent randomized controlled trials have questioned its efficacy. To provide more evidence-based criteria for patient selection, we undertook this study to identify prognostic factors associated with clinical failure after APM for medial meniscus tears. Methods: Medical records of 160 patients followed up for at least 5 years after APM for medial meniscal tears were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data (age, sex, and body mass index), radiographic variables (Kellgren-Lawrence [K-L] grade and hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle), and clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity scale score, Lysholm score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) were recorded. Clinical failure was defined as the need for an additional surgical procedure (arthroscopy, osteotomy, or arthroplasty) or the presence of intolerable pain. Survivorship analysis with clinical failure as an end point was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Factors related to clinical failure were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Cutoff values were determined using areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Radiographic progression of osteoarthritis was analyzed using the chi-square test, and serial changes of clinical scores were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results: Clinical success rates were 95.7% at 5 years, 75.6% at 10 years, and 46.3% at 15 years. Age, HKA angle, and K-L grade ( Conclusions: The poor prognostic factors found to be related to clinical failure after APM for a medial meniscal tear were patient age (≥ 50 years), preoperative K-L grade (≥ grade 2), and preoperative HKA angle (≥ varus 5.5°).

Indexed as

Knee InjuriesOsteoarthritisTibial Meniscus InjuriesArthroscopyHumansMeniscectomyMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesArthroscopic meniscectomyClinical failureKneePrognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID35685983
PMCPMC9152884
OpenAlexW3194443672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.