ReviewClinics in orthopedic surgery2022
Sarcomas in Teachers Using Three-Dimensional Printers: A Report of Three Patients and Literature Review.
Review in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of the carcinogenic potential of particulate matter and organic compound mixtures generated from 3D printing devices in Balb/c 3T3-1-1 cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Are There Sex Differences in the Association of Alcohol Consumption With the Risk of Soft Tissue Sarcoma? A Nationwide Population-based Study in Korea.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Assessment of the carcinogenic potential of particulate matter generated from 3D printing devices in Balb/c 3T3-1-1 cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Can DNA Methylation Profiling Classify Histologic Subtypes and Grades in Soft Tissue Sarcoma?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While low-cost, small-scale, desktop three-dimensional (3D) printers are gaining popularity in the education sector, some studies have reported harmful emissions of particles and volatile organic compounds during the fused deposition modeling (FDM) process, posing a potential health risk. Sarcomas are rare tumors, constituting a group of diverse rare malignant tumors. While some genetic and environmental factors contribute to the development of sarcomas, most cases are idiopathic and sporadic. Methods: We secured the medical records and statements about work environment from teachers diagnosed with sarcomas after frequent use of 3D printers in high schools, reviewed the cases, and described them in narrative format. Furthermore, popularization of FDM 3D printers, worrisome emissions released during the printing process, and related precautions and countermeasures were discussed through literature review. Results: Exceptionally, the cases of sarcomas, such as Ewing's sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, and well-differentiated liposarcoma, arose in a common specific condition. All the teachers regularly operated 3D printers in poorly ventilated spaces for at least 2 years. They had no past or family history of relevant diseases. Conclusions: We first reported three cases of sarcoma in teachers who used 3D printers in poorly ventilated conditions. Although a relationship between the use of 3D printers and the development of sarcomas has not been determined yet, it is important to come up with measures to protect teachers and students using 3D printers from the potential hazard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.