Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685911›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2022

Changes in the Profile of Antibiotic Prescriptions by Dentists in Brazil during the Pandemic.

Fernando de Sá Del Fiol, Isaltino Pereira de Andrade-Jr, Marcus Tolentino da Silva, Silvio Barberato-Filho, Luciane Cruz Lopes, Cristiane de Cassia Bergamaschi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernando de Sá Del FiolDoctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7138-0376
Isaltino Pereira de Andrade-JrDoctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6361-389X
Marcus Tolentino da SilvaDoctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-9075
Silvio Barberato-FilhoDoctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5179-3125
Luciane Cruz LopesDoctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-3275
Cristiane de Cassia BergamaschiDoctoral Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.
Universidade de Sorocaba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, people worldwide, including the scientific community, were insecure and fearful. The lack of vaccines at the beginning of the pandemic and the high mortality rate led to a search for alternative treatments for COVID-19. Among these proposals, a postulated activity of azithromycin was frequently studied in early treatment. In view of this, many countries saw an increase in the consumption of this antibiotic. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate, in Brazil, whether there was an increase in azithromycin prescriptions made by dentists, as they may have been prescribing this antibiotic as a probable treatment for COVID-19. This is an interrupted time series that analyzed antimicrobial prescriptions data between January 2014 and July 2021. The data were taken from the National System of Controlled Products Management, and pre- and postpandemic periods were compared. To assess changes in azithromycin consumption, Joinpoint regression and analysis of variance, followed by Dunnett's test, were used. More than 38 million prescriptions written during the period were analyzed. Amoxicillin (72.3%), azithromycin (18.0%), cephalexin (6.1%), and metronidazole (3.58%) were the most prescribed antibiotics. At the beginning of the pandemic, there was a drop in amoxicillin prescriptions motivated by a decrease in consultations, but conversely, in less than three months, azithromycin prescriptions grew by more than 100%. The exaggerated use of this antibiotic during the pandemic will certainly have consequences in the short and medium term on indicators of bacterial resistance. The use of guidelines and respect for the therapeutic protocols of government agencies should be fundamental for collective and strategic action in the fight against health emergencies.

Identifiers

PMID35685911
PMCPMC9172209
OpenAlexW4281772916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.