Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685868›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Linear Growth Trajectories, Catch-up Growth, and Its Predictors Among North Indian Small-for-Gestational Age Low Birthweight Infants: A Secondary Data Analysis.

Bireshwar Sinha, Tarun Shankar Choudhary, Nitika Nitika, Mohan Kumar, Sarmila Mazumder, Sunita Taneja, Nita Bhandari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02653534 (Impact of Promoting Community Initiated Kangaroo Mother Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02653534 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Promoting Community Initiated Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) for Low Birth Weight Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorSociety for Applied StudiesRan2015 to 2018Enrolled8,402ConditionsLow-Birth-WeightArmsKangaroo Mother Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bireshwar SinhaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Tarun Shankar ChoudharyDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nitika NitikaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Mohan KumarCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Sarmila MazumderCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Sunita TanejaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Nita BhandariCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Society for Applied Studies · INUniversity of Bergen · NOWellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low birthweight small-for-gestational-age (SGA-LBW) (birthweight below the 10th percentile for gestational age; SGA-LBW) infants are at an increased risk of poor postnatal growth outcomes. Linear growth trajectories of SGA-LBW infants are less studied in South Asian settings including India. Objectives: To describe the linear growth trajectories of the SGA-LBW infants compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age LBW (AGA-LBW) infants during the first 6 months of life. In addition, we estimated catch-up growth (ΔLAZ > 0.67) in SGA-LBW infants and their performance against the WHO linear growth velocity cut-offs. Additionally, we studied factors associated with poor catch-up growth in SGA-LBW infants. Methods: The data utilized came from an individually randomized controlled trial that included low birthweight (LBW) infants weighing 1,500-2,250 g at birth. A total of 8,360 LBW infants were included. For comparison between SGA-LBW and AGA-LBW infants, we presented unadjusted and adjusted estimates for mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios ( Results: Low birthweight small-for-gestational-age infants had a higher risk of stunting, lower attained length, and a lower LAZ score throughout the first 6 months of life compared with AGA-LBW infants, with differences being maximum at 28 days and minimum at 6 months of age. The linear growth velocity in SGA-LBW infants compared with AGA-LBW infants was significantly lower during the birth-28 day period [MD -0.19, 95% confidence interval ( Conclusion: Small for gestational age (SGA) status at birth, independent of gestational age, is a determinant of poor postnatal linear growth. Promotion of institutional deliveries, exclusive breastfeeding, and prevention and early treatment of pneumonia may be helpful to improve linear growth in SGA-LBW infants during early infancy. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [NCT02653534].

Indexed as

catch-up growth (CUG)growth falteringlinear growthlow birthweight (LBW) infantsmall for gestational age (SGA)

Identifiers

PMID35685868
PMCPMC9173003
OpenAlexW4285744726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.