ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Flow Diversion for the Management of Ruptured Intracranial Arterial Infudibular Dilatation: Proof of Principle and Therapeutic Protocol.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thought to be benign anatomical variants, cerebral infundibular dilatations (ID) are most commonly encountered at the junction of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the posterior communicating artery (PcomA). The true nature of this entity remains controversial, as some literature reports suggest they should be considered preaneurysmal lesions and a potential source of devastating subarachnoid hemorrhage. This report describes cases of presumably ruptured IDs and their therapeutic endovascular management. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed patients with isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) where the only potential cause was ruptured cerebral IDs, treated or not, between January 2012 and June 2021. Morphological and radiological features, treatment and procedural considerations, clinical and angiographic outcomes were also reviewed. Natural history of the ID is poorly understood, and its relation to SAH remains controversial. Ruptured cerebral IDs can be the suspected cause of bleeding if no other vascular lesion is present during multimodal examinations. Endovascular flow diversion stenting is safe and effective for the proper treatment of ruptured IDs. Pending further validations with longitudinal data are needed to legitimate the natural course of these mysterious lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.