ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Polymyxin B, Cefoperazone Sodium-Sulbactam Sodium, and Tigecycline against Multidrug-Resistant
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Polymyxin B, Cefoperazone Sodium-Sulbactam Sodium, and Tigecycline against Multidrug-ResistantEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-13Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the significance of polymyxin B in combination with cefoperazone sodium-sulbactam sodium (CSSS) and tigecycline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Methods: Fifty-six patients with MDRAB pneumonia admitted to the Fifth People's Hospital of Wuhu from February 2019 to December 2021 were randomized into the observation group ( Results: There was no significant difference in the overall response rate between the two groups; the bacterial clearance of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the observation group; there was no significant difference in the WBC, CRP, and PCT levels between the two groups prior to the treatment; but after treatment, while the WBC, CRP, and PCT levels of the two groups decreased, the WBC count, CRP, and PCT levels of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the observation group; no significant difference was found in adverse reactions. Conclusion: Polymyxin B-CSSS-tigecycline has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of MDRAB pneumonia. It not only improves the patients' bacterial clearance rate and effectively reduces the levels of WBC count, serum CRP, and PCT, but also raises no risk of adverse reactions. Therefore, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.