Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685590›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical practice2022

Can Artificial Intelligence Be Applied to Diagnose Intracerebral Hemorrhage under the Background of the Fourth Industrial Revolution? A Novel Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kai Zhao, Qing Zhao, Ping Zhou, Bin Liu, Qiang Zhang, Mingfei Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kai ZhaoGraduate School, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, Qinghai, China.
Qing ZhaoHuman Resource, Women's and Children's Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China.
Ping ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China.
Qiang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9504-9397
Mingfei YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining 810007, Qinghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-1470
Qinghai Provincial Peoples Hospital · CNQinghai No.3 People's Hospital · CNQinghai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We intended to provide the clinical evidence that artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to assist doctors in the diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods: Studies published in 2021 were identified after the literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to perform the quality assessment of studies. Data extraction of diagnosis effect included accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), area under curve (AUC), and Dice scores (Dices). The pooled effect with its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated by the random effects model. Results: Twenty-five diagnostic tests of ICH via AI and doctors with overall high quality were included. Pooled ACC, SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, AUC, and Dices were 0.88 (0.83∼0.93), 0.85 (0.81∼0.89), 0.90 (0.88∼0.92), 0.80 (0.75∼0.85), 0.93 (0.91∼0.95), 0.84 (0.80∼0.89), and 0.90 (0.85∼0.95), respectively. There was no publication bias. All of results were stable as revealed by sensitivity analysis and were accordant as outcomes via subgroups analysis. Conclusion: Under the background of the fourth industrial revolution, AI might be an effective and efficient tool to assist doctors in the clinical diagnosis of ICH.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCerebral HemorrhageHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID35685590
PMCPMC9159188
OpenAlexW4220942494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.