ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2022
A Clinicopathologic Analysis of Decidual Polyps: A Potentially Problematic Diagnosis.
Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors of decidual polyps in the first trimester after fresh cycle embryo transfer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Clinical application of hysteroscopic decidual polypectomy in pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Vaginoscopic polypectomy for cervical polyps during pregnancy: an analysis of safety and influencing factors for pregnancy outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The decidual polyp is a special cervical polyp that is not systemically reported or well known. The aim of this study was to describe the clinicopathologic features of the decidual polyps observed at the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University between 2015 and 2020 and to spread awareness of them. Methods: Two hundred and fifty cases of decidual polyps, accounting for 45.45% (250/550) of all cervical polyps identified during pregnancy, were reviewed. The patients were followed up until the end of their pregnancies, which delivered <28 weeks and between 28 and 37 weeks, and full-term delivery. The Results: Most of the decidual polyps occurred during the first trimester, with a median patient age of 33 years. The polyps were both singles and multiples and located at the cervix, with a long stalk, and a median diameter of one centimeter. The gross morphological appearance varied from polypoid to lingulate, and they were fragile and bled easily. Microscopically, the decidual polyps showed diffuse glandular secretion as well as decidual changes in the stromal cells. They could be divided into two subtypes: decidua fragment and decidua with endometrial polyp formation. Seventy-three patients who went on to have further pregnancies were followed until the end of the study period. Twenty-one (21/73, 28.77%) of them had adverse pregnancy outcomes (12 cases delivered <28 weeks and 9 cases delivered between 28 and 37 weeks). Conclusions: The data showed that the decidual polyp was the second most common cervical polyp during pregnancy, and its incidence was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, this type of polyp should be considered in cervical polypectomy specimens from pregnant women. A more uniform and accurate pathological diagnosis, including the thrombus status and division subtype, could provide the basis for obstetricians to promote treatment improving pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.