Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685560›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical practice2022

Unraveling the Mystery of COVID-19 Postvaccination Myocarditis: A Systematic Review of Current Cases.

Hamed Ghoshouni, Sara Bagherieh, Mohammad Parvizinia, Mozhde Askari, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Omid Mirmosayyeb

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamed GhoshouniSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-2256
Sara BagheriehSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-9164
Mohammad ParviziniaSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-1089
Mozhde AskariSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-3389
Masoumeh SadeghiCardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-5558
Omid MirmosayyebSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-2985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the early stages of the pandemic, the development and mass production of a safe and effective vaccine seemed like the greatest tool, to win the fight against the virus. In the present study, we comprehensively conducted a systematic review of all current cases worldwide to better understand whether there is a link between COVID-19 vaccination and one of the most devastating complications, cardiac Inflammation. Our search retrieved over 250 results, of which 130 met the inclusion criteria, and their respective data were extracted. The results suggest that postvaccination myocarditis and pericarditis are more likely to be seen in male, younger, and mRNA-vaccinated individuals. Most affected patients experienced symptoms following the second shot, and complaint of chest pain was the most prevalent presentation. Currently, no direct link can be drawn between the vaccines and the risk of cardiac inflammation.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMyocarditisPericarditisHumansMalemRNA VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35685560
PMCPMC9159134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.