ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Can we infer tumor presence of single cell transcriptomes and their tumor of origin from bulk transcriptomes by machine learning?
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Latent Filtering for Gene Discovery in Breast Cancer Subtypes.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Tumor cell type and gene marker identification by single layer perceptron neural network on single-cell RNA sequence data.Journal of biosciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing need to build a model that uses single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) to separate malignant cells from nonmalignant cells and to identify tumor of origin of single cells and/or circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Currently, it is infeasible to build a tumor of origin model learnt from scRNA-seq by machine learning (ML). We then wondered if an ML model learnt from bulk transcriptomes is applicable to scRNA-seq to infer single cells' tumor presence and further indicate their tumor of origin. We used k-nearest neighbors, one-versus-all support vector machine, one-versus-one support vector machine, random forest and introduced scTumorTrace to conduct a pioneering experiment containing leukocytes and seven major cancer types where bulk RNA-seq and scRNA-seq data were available. 13 ML models learnt from bulk RNA-seq were all reliable to use (F-score > 96%) shown by a validation set of bulk transcriptomes, but none of them was applicable to scRNA-seq except scTumorTrace. Making inferences from bulk RNA-seq to scRNA-seq was impaired by feature selection and improved by log2-transformed TPM units. scTumorTrace with transcriptome-wide 2-tuples showed F-score beyond 98.74 and 94.29% in inferring tumor presence and tumor of origin at single-cell resolution and correctly identified 45 single candidate prostate CTCs but lineage-confirmed non-CTCs as leukocytes. We concluded that modern ML techniques are quantitative and could hardly address the raised questions. scTumorTrace with transcriptome-wide 2-tuples is qualitative, standardization-free and not subject to log2-transformed quantities, enabling us to infer tumor presence of single cell transcriptomes and their tumor of origin from bulk transcriptomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.