ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Evolution and host adaptability of plant RNA viruses: Research insights on compositional biases.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution of virulence of a plant RNA virus in developmental stage-structured host populations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Leptochloa chinensis identified as a new reservoir host of southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus.Crop health · 2026Article
- Codon Usage Bias Analysis of Citrus Leaf Blotch Virus.Viruses · 2025Article
- Codon Usage Bias in Human RNA Viruses and Its Impact on Viral Translation, Fitness, and Evolution.Viruses · 2025Review
- Comprehensive analysis of the codon usage patterns in the polyprotein coding sequences of the honeybee viruses.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Genetic analysis of tomato brown rugose fruit virus reveals evolutionary adaptation and codon usage bias patterns.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Sensing nucleotide composition in virus RNA.Bioscience reports · 2023Review
- Article
- Coronavirus accessory protein ORF3 biology and its contribution to viral behavior and pathogenesis.iScience · 2023Review
- NanoViromics: long-read sequencing of dsRNA for plant virus and viroid rapid detection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During recent decades, many new emerging or re-emerging RNA viruses have been found in plants through the development of deep-sequencing technology and big data analysis. These findings largely changed our understanding of the origin, evolution and host range of plant RNA viruses. There is evidence that their genetic composition originates from viruses, and host populations play a key role in the evolution and host adaptability of plant RNA viruses. In this mini-review, we describe the state of our understanding of the evolution of plant RNA viruses in view of compositional biases and explore how they adapt to the host. It appears that adenine rich (A-rich) coding sequences, low CpG and UpA dinucleotide frequencies and lower codon usage patterns were found in the vast majority of plant RNA viruses. The codon usage pattern of plant RNA viruses was influenced by both natural selection and mutation pressure, and natural selection mostly from hosts was the dominant factor. The codon adaptation analyses support that plant RNA viruses probably evolved a dynamic balance between codon adaptation and deoptimization to maintain efficient replication cycles in multiple hosts with various codon usage patterns. In the future, additional combinations of computational and experimental analyses of the nucleotide composition and codon usage of plant RNA viruses should be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.