Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685316›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2022

Deceased Donor Procurement Biopsy Practices, Interpretation, and Histology-Based Decision-Making: A Survey of US Kidney Transplant Centers.

Krista L Lentine, Vidya A Fleetwood, Yasar Caliskan, Henry Randall, Jason R Wellen, Melissa Lichtenberger, Craig Dedert, Richard Rothweiler, Gary Marklin, Diane Brockmeier and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of kidney procurement biopsy and machine perfusion on allograft outcomes: A retrospective cohort study of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The early impacts of an attempt to standardize kidney procurement biopsy practices.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. OPTN/SRTR 2023 Annual Data Report: Kidney.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Krista L LentineSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Vidya A FleetwoodSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Yasar CaliskanSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Henry RandallSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jason R WellenWashington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Melissa LichtenbergerWashington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Craig DedertSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Richard RothweilerMid-America Transplant, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Gary MarklinMid-America Transplant, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Diane BrockmeierMid-America Transplant, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Mark A SchnitzlerSaint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Syed A HusainColumbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Sumit MohanColumbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Bertram L KasiskeHennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew CooperMed-Star Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Roslyn B MannonUniversity of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
David A AxelrodUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The utility of kidney procurement biopsies is controversial. Understanding the current landscape of how clinicians obtain and use biopsies in organ evaluation may help inform consensus-building efforts. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to clinicians at US kidney transplant programs (April 22, 2021-June 30, 2021) to evaluate donor biopsy indications, frequency, processing and interpretation, and impact of findings on practices. Results: Responses from staff involved in organ acceptance (73% surgeons, 20% nephrologists, 6% coordinators) at 95 transplant centers were analyzed, representing 40% of US transplant centers and 50% of recent deceased donor kidney transplant volume. More than a third of centers (35%) reported obtaining procurement biopsies on most-to-all kidneys. Most clinicians decided when to biopsy jointly with the Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) (82%) based on formal criteria for the decision (72%), although 41% reported having requested a biopsy outside of the criteria. Most respondents used a semiquantitative scoring system for interpretation (57%). Many respondents reported rarely or never having access to renal specialty pathologists (37%) or to telepathology (59%). Most respondents reported that a favorable biopsy result would encourage them to accept a "marginal" donor kidney (72%); nearly half (46%) indicated that an unfavorable biopsy result would lead to decline of a standard criteria kidney. Conclusion: Procurement biopsies are commonly used in organ acceptance decisions despite inconsistent access to experienced renal pathologists and heterogeneous approaches to criteria, scoring, and interpretation. Ongoing study and consensus building are needed to direct procurement biopsy practice toward increasing organ utilization and reducing allocation inefficiency.

Indexed as

biopsykidney donationorgan procurementorgan quality assessmentpractice variationsurveys

Identifiers

PMID35685316
PMCPMC9171615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.