Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685144›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Classification and Pathological Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia.

Zhihua Chen, Wenqiang Huang, Yibo Song

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhihua ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong 525000, China.
Wenqiang HuangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong 525000, China.
Yibo SongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong 525000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3021-4272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is a group of progressive lower respiratory tract diseases of unknown origin characterized by diffuse alveolitis and alveolar structural disorders leading to pulmonary fibrillation and hypertension, pulmonary heart disease, and right heart failure due to pulmonary fibrosis, and more than half of them die from respiratory failure. To address these problems of overly complex prediction methods and large data sets involved in the prediction process of interstitial pneumonia, this paper proposes a prediction model for interstitial pneumonia which is based on the Gaussian Parsimonious Bayes algorithm. Three usual tests of pneumonia, specifically from various patients, were collected as the sample set. These samples are divided into training and testing sets. Additionally, a cross-validation strategy was used to avoid the overfitting problem. The results showed that the prediction model based on the Gaussian Parsimonious Bayes algorithm predicted 92% accuracy on the test set, and the Parsimonious Bayes method could directly predict the final detection of interstitial pneumonia based on the usual pneumonia test pneumonia. In addition, it was found that the closer the data distribution of the sample set was to a normal distribution, the higher the prediction accuracy was, and then, after excluding pneumonia from the test below 60 points, the prediction accuracy reached 96%.

Indexed as

Idiopathic Interstitial PneumoniasLung Diseases, InterstitialAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansLung

Identifiers

PMID35685144
PMCPMC9173946
OpenAlexW4281868049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.