ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022
[Clinical profile and survival of patients with lupus nephritis in the department of nephrology in Cameroon: a single-center study].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lupus Nephropathy in Mauritania: A Clinical and Longitudinal Study from the National Hospital Center of Nouakchott.Cureus · 2025Article
- Lupus and other autoimmune diseases: Epidemiology in the population of African ancestry and diagnostic and management challenges in Africa.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: prognosis of lupus nephritis in sub-Saharan Africa is poorly known. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical profile and survival of patients with lupus nephritis treated in the Department of Nephrology. Methods: we conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study over a period of 5 years. Patients with newly diagnosed lupus nephritis and followed-up for more than 3 months were included in the study. Lupus nephritis was defined as the presence of signs of glomerular damage, whether histologically confirmed or not. We investigated clinical data, treatment effects, and mortality rates. Results: a total of 20 patients were enrolled in the study, including 17 women (85%). The average age [IQ] of patients was 27 [18- 37] years. Systemic lupus erythematosus was diagnosed concomitantly with lupus nephritis in 90% (n=18) of patients. Twelve (60%) patients had nephrotic syndrome. Active proliferative classes were mainly reported (n=5, 72%). Fifteen patients (75%) received induction therapy and remission was obtained in 6 (30%) patients. At 12 and 24 months, renal and global survival was 68.6% and 49%, and 57.8% and 31%, respectively. The absence of remission was associated with poor prognosis. Conclusion: lupus nephropathy is a common way of revealing lupus in our context. Prognosis is poor, and more than half of patients die or develop end-stage renal disease within 24 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.