Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35685058›Full record

ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2022

Turkish Version of Structured Interview of Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and Proposal of a Brief Version of SIPS as a Pretest Risk Enrichment.

Ayşegül Tonyali, Gül Karaçetin, Arzu Kanik, Elif Ertaş, Uğur Karabağ, Öykü Umut, Oğulcan Çiray, Bedriye Özkan, Çağatay Ermiş

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayşegül TonyaliDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Prof Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Disorders Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gül KaraçetinDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Prof Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Disorders Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Arzu KanikDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Health Sciences, Mersin, Turkey.
Elif ErtaşDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Health Sciences, Mersin, Turkey.
Uğur KarabağDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Prof Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Disorders Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Öykü UmutHacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Oğulcan ÇirayDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Bedriye ÖzkanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Prof Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Disorders Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Çağatay ErmişDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Dokuz Eylül University · TRHacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Structured Interview of Psychosis Risk Syndromes (SIPS) was created to identify patients with Clinical High Risk for psychosis (CHR). This study aimed i) to translate and validate the Scale of Prodromal Syndromes (SOPS) in Turkish adolescents, ii) to explore the factor structure of the SIPS/SOPS in the adolescent population, especially focusing on those under the age of 15, iii) to generate a brief version of SIPS (SIPS-B). Methods: A total of 150 adolescents aged between 12 and 18 years, were consecutively interviewed using SIPS/SOPS. Patients with psychotic syndrome (n=20), psychosis risk syndrome (PRS) (n=59), and clinical controls (CC) (n=71) were included in the study. Results: Principal component analysis (PCA) yielded three latent factors, explaining 62.7% of the total variance in the whole clinical sample, including positive symptom factor, disorganized symptom factor, and negative symptom factor. The area under curve calculated in ROC analyses involving PRS and CC supported the four-item form of the SIPS-B (optimal cut-off=12.5, sensitivity=87%, specificity=80%). Conclusion: Our study results support the notion that the Turkish translation of SIPS/SOPS meets the reliability and validity criteria in Turkish adolescents. The SIPS-B could aid clinicians in their routine clinical practice to expedite referral procedures.

Indexed as

ProdromepsychosisreliabilitySIPSTurkish validity

Identifiers

PMID35685058
PMCPMC9142018
OpenAlexW4205465113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.