ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2022
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge Questionnaire.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple Sclerosis Knowledge Questionnaire (MSKQ) is a self-administered inventory assessing patients' knowledge about Multiple Sclerosis. In this study, we aimed to test the reliability and validity of MSKQ in Turkish patients. Methods: Patients with Multiple Sclerosis who attended an education seminar in our university hospital were enrolled in the study. Results: Fifty-eight patients completed and returned the questionnaire twice, before and after the seminar. Mean number of items that were answered correctly in the first round was 12.8 (5.2), which increased to 18.7 (3.2) in the second round after the seminar. This increase was found to be significant (p<0.01). Conclusion: Questions regarding general characteristics of the disease were found to be answered correctly more often than those questions regarding diagnostic and treatment options. This finding indicates that patients may be more interested in the general characteristics of the disease and in the factors that may have started the disease process. Higher number of incorrect answers regarding diagnostic and treatment strategies may be caused by a lack of interest on the part of the patient who may perceive these subjects to be too complex or who may choose to leave decision-making to healthcare professionals. Also, physicians may be unable to inform patients in these areas because of a lack of time or resources. New molecules developed for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis makes it even more difficult for patients to follow and form their own opinions about the treatment process. These results show us that patient education is essential and our patients need more educational resources, especially regarding treatment options. The significant increase in the number of correct answers after the education seminar supports the need for broader patient education (p<0.01). Turkish version of MSKQ is a reliable and valid measure for assessing patients' level of knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.