ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Novel Detection and Multi-Classification Approach for IoT-Malware Using Random Forest Voting of Fine-Tuning Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Explainable Hybrid CNN-Transformer Architecture for Visual Malware Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Blockchain-based zero trust networks with federated transfer learning for IoT security in industry 5.0.PloS one · 2025Article
- Federated Learning in the Detection of Fake News Using Deep Learning as a Basic Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Harnessing AI and analytics to enhance cybersecurity and privacy for collective intelligence systems.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Autonomous Self-Adaptive and Self-Aware Optical Wireless Communication Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Visual design of green information in urban environment based on global similarity calculation and multi-dimensional visualization technology.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven malware detection framework for internet of things environment.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Deep Learning in the Detection of Disinformation about COVID-19 in Online Space.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning and Lexicon Approach to Texts Processing in the Detection of Degrees of Toxicity in Online Discussions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is prone to malware assaults due to its simple installation and autonomous operating qualities. IoT devices have become the most tempting targets of malware due to well-known vulnerabilities such as weak, guessable, or hard-coded passwords, a lack of secure update procedures, and unsecured network connections. Traditional static IoT malware detection and analysis methods have been shown to be unsatisfactory solutions to understanding IoT malware behavior for mitigation and prevention. Deep learning models have made huge strides in the realm of cybersecurity in recent years, thanks to their tremendous data mining, learning, and expression capabilities, thus easing the burden on malware analysts. In this context, a novel detection and multi-classification vision-based approach for IoT-malware is proposed. This approach makes use of the benefits of deep transfer learning methodology and incorporates the fine-tuning method and various ensembling strategies to increase detection and classification performance without having to develop the training models from scratch. It adopts the fusion of 3 CNNs, ResNet18, MobileNetV2, and DenseNet161, by using the random forest voting strategy. Experiments are carried out using a publicly available dataset, MaleVis, to assess and validate the suggested approach. MaleVis contains 14,226 RGB converted images representing 25 malware classes and one benign class. The obtained findings show that our suggested approach outperforms the existing state-of-the-art solutions in terms of detection and classification performance; it achieves a precision of 98.74%, recall of 98.67%, a specificity of 98.79%, F1-score of 98.70%, MCC of 98.65%, an accuracy of 98.68%, and an average processing time per malware classification of 672 ms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.