Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684918›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

BrainGAN: Brain MRI Image Generation and Classification Framework Using GAN Architectures and CNN Models.

Halima Hamid N Alrashedy, Atheer Fahad Almansour, Dina M Ibrahim, Mohammad Ali A Hammoudeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Deep Learning on MRI Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ensemble deep learning for brain tumor detection.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Halima Hamid N AlrashedyDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Atheer Fahad AlmansourDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Dina M IbrahimDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-0577
Mohammad Ali A HammoudehDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-2365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning models have been used in several domains, however, adjusting is still required to be applied in sensitive areas such as medical imaging. As the use of technology in the medical domain is needed because of the time limit, the level of accuracy assures trustworthiness. Because of privacy concerns, machine learning applications in the medical field are unable to use medical data. For example, the lack of brain MRI images makes it difficult to classify brain tumors using image-based classification. The solution to this challenge was achieved through the application of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based augmentation techniques. Deep Convolutional GAN (DCGAN) and Vanilla GAN are two examples of GAN architectures used for image generation. In this paper, a framework, denoted as BrainGAN, for generating and classifying brain MRI images using GAN architectures and deep learning models was proposed. Consequently, this study proposed an automatic way to check that generated images are satisfactory. It uses three models: CNN, MobileNetV2, and ResNet152V2. Training the deep transfer models with images made by Vanilla GAN and DCGAN, and then evaluating their performance on a test set composed of real brain MRI images. From the results of the experiment, it was found that the ResNet152V2 model outperformed the other two models. The ResNet152V2 achieved 99.09% accuracy, 99.12% precision, 99.08% recall, 99.51% area under the curve (AUC), and 0.196 loss based on the brain MRI images generated by DCGAN architecture.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansMachine LearningNeuroimagingbrain MRI imagesDCGANsdeep learningimage classificationimage generationvanilla GANs

Identifiers

PMID35684918
PMCPMC9185441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.