Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684831›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Towards Deep Radar Perception for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges.

Yi Zhou, Lulu Liu, Haocheng Zhao, Miguel López-Benítez, Limin Yu, Yutao Yue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi ZhouInstitute of Deep Perception Technology (JITRI), Wuxi 214000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-3316
Lulu LiuInstitute of Deep Perception Technology (JITRI), Wuxi 214000, China.
Haocheng ZhaoInstitute of Deep Perception Technology (JITRI), Wuxi 214000, China.
Miguel López-BenítezDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0526-6687
Limin YuDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6891-0604
Yutao YueInstitute of Deep Perception Technology (JITRI), Wuxi 214000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-0924

Funding

Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University REF-19-01-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent developments, the performance of automotive radar has improved significantly. The next generation of 4D radar can achieve imaging capability in the form of high-resolution point clouds. In this context, we believe that the era of deep learning for radar perception has arrived. However, studies on radar deep learning are spread across different tasks, and a holistic overview is lacking. This review paper attempts to provide a big picture of the deep radar perception stack, including signal processing, datasets, labelling, data augmentation, and downstream tasks such as depth and velocity estimation, object detection, and sensor fusion. For these tasks, we focus on explaining how the network structure is adapted to radar domain knowledge. In particular, we summarise three overlooked challenges in deep radar perception, including multi-path effects, uncertainty problems, and adverse weather effects, and present some attempts to solve them.

Indexed as

RadarSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedPerceptionWeatherautomotive radarsautonomous drivingdeep learningmulti-sensor fusionobject detectionradar signal processing

Identifiers

PMID35684831
PMCPMC9185239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.