ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
HiVTac: A High-Speed Vision-Based Tactile Sensor for Precise and Real-Time Force Reconstruction with Fewer Markers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vision-based tactile sensing enhanced by microstructures and lightweight convolutional neural network.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Computer Vision-Based Optical Odometry Sensors: A Comparative Study of Classical Tracking Methods for Non-Contact Surface Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- TactiGraph: An Asynchronous Graph Neural Network for Contact Angle Prediction Using Neuromorphic Vision-Based Tactile Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although they have been under development for years and are attracting a lot of attention, vision-based tactile sensors still have common defects-the use of such devices to infer the direction of external forces is poorly investigated, and the operating frequency is too low for them to be applied in practical scenarios. Moreover, discussion of the deformation of elastomers used in vision-based tactile sensors remains insufficient. This research focuses on analyzing the deformation of a thin elastic layer on a vision-based tactile sensor by establishing a simplified deformation model, which is cross-validated using the finite element method. Further, this model suggests a reduction in the number of markers required by a vision-based tactile sensor. In subsequent testing, a prototype HiVTac is fabricated, and it demonstrates superior accuracy to its vision-based tactile sensor counterparts in reconstructing an external force. The average error of inferring the direction of external force is 0.32∘, and the root mean squared error of inferring the magnitude of the external force is 0.0098 N. The prototype was capable of working at a sampling rate of 100 Hz and a processing frequency of 1.3 kHz, even on a general PC, allowing for real-time reconstructions of not only the direction but also the magnitude of an external force.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.