Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684790›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Single Image Dehazing Using Global Illumination Compensation.

Junbao Zheng, Chenke Xu, Wei Zhang, Xu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junbao ZhengSchool of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Chenke XuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Xu YangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 6217010850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing dehazing algorithms hardly consider background interference in the process of estimating the atmospheric illumination value and transmittance, resulting in an unsatisfactory dehazing effect. In order to solve the problem, this paper proposes a novel global illumination compensation-based image-dehazing algorithm (GIC). The GIC method compensates for the intensity of light scattered when light passes through atmospheric particles such as fog. Firstly, the illumination compensation was accomplished in the CIELab color space using the shading partition enhancement mechanism. Secondly, the atmospheric illumination values and transmittance parameters of these enhanced images were computed to improve the performance of atmospheric-scattering models, in order to reduce the interference of background signals. Eventually, the dehazing result maps with reduced background interference were obtained with the computed atmospheric-scattering model. The dehazing experiments were carried out on the public data set, and the dehazing results of the foggy image were compared with cutting-edge dehazing algorithms. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed GIC algorithm shows enhanced consistency with the real-imaging situation in estimating atmospheric illumination and transmittance. Compared with established image-dehazing methods, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the structural similarity (SSIM) metrics of the proposed GIC method increased by 3.25 and 0.084, respectively.

Indexed as

dark channel prior (DCP)fog imagingglobal illumination compensation factorguided filteringimage dehazingshading partition enhancement mechanism

Identifiers

PMID35684790
PMCPMC9185279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.