ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Dermoscopic Image Classification Method Using an Ensemble of Fine-Tuned Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperparameter Optimization of Convolutional Neural Networks for Robust Tumor Image Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aiming at the problems of large intra-class differences, small inter-class differences, low contrast, and small and unbalanced datasets in dermoscopic images, this paper proposes a dermoscopic image classification method based on an ensemble of fine-tuned convolutional neural networks. By reconstructing the fully connected layers of the three pretrained models of Xception, ResNet50, and Vgg-16 and then performing transfer learning and fine-tuning the three pretrained models with the ISIC 2016 Challenge official skin dataset, we integrated the outputs of the three base models using a weighted fusion ensemble strategy in order to obtain a final prediction result able to distinguish whether a dermoscopic image indicates malignancy. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the ensemble model is 86.91%, the precision is 85.67%, the recall is 84.03%, and the F1-score is 84.84%, with these four evaluation metrics being better than those of the three basic models and better than some classical methods, proving the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.