Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684736›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Deep Learning Regression Approaches Applied to Estimate Tillering in Tropical Forages Using Mobile Phone Images.

Luiz Santos, José Marcato Junior, Pedro Zamboni, Mateus Santos, Liana Jank, Edilene Campos, Edson Takashi Matsubara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating UAV-based phenotyping strategies forFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luiz SantosFaculty of Computer Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0380-1957
José Marcato JuniorFaculty of Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism and Geography, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-6866
Pedro ZamboniFaculty of Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism and Geography, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-3621
Mateus SantosEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5324-906X
Liana JankEmbrapa Beef Cattle, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9436-3678
Edilene CamposFaculty of Computer Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4427-608X
Edson Takashi MatsubaraFaculty of Computer Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-0886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the performance of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based approaches using mobile phone images to estimate regrowth density in tropical forages. We generated a dataset composed of 1124 labeled images with 2 mobile phones 7 days after the harvest of the forage plants. Six architectures were evaluated, including AlexNet, ResNet (18, 34, and 50 layers), ResNeXt101, and DarkNet. The best regression model showed a mean absolute error of 7.70 and a correlation of 0.89. Our findings suggest that our proposal using deep learning on mobile phone images can successfully be used to estimate regrowth density in forages.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneDeep LearningNeural Networks, Computerdeep learningforagesregrowth density

Identifiers

PMID35684736
PMCPMC9185313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.