ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Nuclei-Guided Network for Breast Cancer Grading in HE-Stained Pathological Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of stain normalization techniques in automated grading of invasive ductal carcinoma histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- USP13 promotes breast cancer metastasis through FBXL14-induced Twist1 ubiquitination.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Characterization of Nuclear Pleomorphism and Tubules in Histopathological Images of Breast Cancer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer grading methods based on hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained pathological images can be summarized into two categories. The first category is to directly extract the pathological image features for breast cancer grading. However, unlike the coarse-grained problem of breast cancer classification, breast cancer grading is a fine-grained classification problem, so general methods cannot achieve satisfactory results. The second category is to apply the three evaluation criteria of the Nottingham Grading System (NGS) separately, and then integrate the results of the three criteria to obtain the final grading result. However, NGS is only a semiquantitative evaluation method, and there may be far more image features related to breast cancer grading. In this paper, we proposed a Nuclei-Guided Network (NGNet) for breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) grading in pathological images. The proposed nuclei-guided attention module plays the role of nucleus attention, so as to learn more nuclei-related feature representations for breast IDC grading. In addition, the proposed nuclei-guided fusion module in the fusion process of different branches can further enable the network to focus on learning nuclei-related features. Overall, under the guidance of nuclei-related features, the entire NGNet can learn more fine-grained features for breast IDC grading. The experimental results show that the performance of the proposed method is better than that of state-of-the-art method. In addition, we released a well-labeled dataset with 3644 pathological images for breast IDC grading. This dataset is currently the largest publicly available breast IDC grading dataset and can serve as a benchmark to facilitate a broader study of breast IDC grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.