Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684649›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Inertial Data-Based AI Approaches for ADL and Fall Recognition.

Luís M Martins, Nuno Ferrete Ribeiro, Filipa Soares, Cristina P Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luís M MartinsCenter for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1005-9933
Nuno Ferrete RibeiroCenter for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4177-2587
Filipa SoaresCenter for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.
Cristina P SantosCenter for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0023-7203

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PD/BD/141515/2018Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UMINHO-VC/BII/2021/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) has been a widely debated topic, with applications in a vast range of fields. ADL recognition can be accomplished by processing data from wearable sensors, specially located at the lower trunk, which appears to be a suitable option in uncontrolled environments. Several authors have addressed ADL recognition using Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based algorithms, obtaining encouraging results. However, the number of ADL recognized by these algorithms is still limited, rarely focusing on transitional activities, and without addressing falls. Furthermore, the small amount of data used and the lack of information regarding validation processes are other drawbacks found in the literature. To overcome these drawbacks, a total of nine public and private datasets were merged in order to gather a large amount of data to improve the robustness of several ADL recognition algorithms. Furthermore, an AI-based framework was developed in this manuscript to perform a comparative analysis of several ADL Machine Learning (ML)-based classifiers. Feature selection algorithms were used to extract only the relevant features from the dataset's lower trunk inertial data. For the recognition of 20 different ADL and falls, results have shown that the best performance was obtained with the K-NN classifier with the first 85 features ranked by Relief-F (98.22% accuracy). However, Ensemble Learning classifier with the first 65 features ranked by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) presented 96.53% overall accuracy while maintaining a lower classification time per window (0.039 ms), showing a higher potential for its usage in real-time scenarios in the future. Deep Learning algorithms were also tested. Despite its outcomes not being as good as in the prior procedure, their potential was also demonstrated (overall accuracy of 92.55% for Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Neural Network), indicating that they could be a valid option in the future.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingArtificial IntelligenceAccidental FallsAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, Computeractivity recognitiondataset fusiondeep learningfallsfeature selectionMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35684649
PMCPMC9185447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.