Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684609›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Accurate Step Count with Generalized and Personalized Deep Learning on Accelerometer Data.

Long Luu, Arvind Pillai, Halsey Lea, Ruben Buendia, Faisal M Khan, Glynn Dennis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Long LuuDigital Health, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1761-3105
Arvind PillaiDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Halsey LeaDigital Health, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.
Ruben BuendiaBiometrics, Late-Stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, 43183 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8126-9922
Faisal M KhanAI & Analytics, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5116-7471
Glynn DennisAI & Analytics, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.

Funding

AstraZeneca (United States) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is globally recognized as a pillar of general health. Step count, as one measure of PA, is a well known predictor of long-term morbidity and mortality. Despite its popularity in consumer devices, a lack of methodological standards and clinical validation remains a major impediment to step count being accepted as a valid clinical endpoint. Previous works have mainly focused on device-specific step-count algorithms and often employ sensor modalities that may not be widely available. This may limit step-count suitability in clinical scenarios. In this paper, we trained neural network models on publicly available data and tested on an independent cohort using two approaches: generalization and personalization. Specifically, we trained neural networks on accelerometer signals from one device and either directly applied them or adapted them individually to accelerometer data obtained from a separate subject cohort wearing multiple distinct devices. The best models exhibited highly accurate step-count estimates for both the generalization (96-99%) and personalization (98-99%) approaches. The results demonstrate that it is possible to develop device-agnostic, accelerometer-only algorithms that provide highly accurate step counts, positioning step count as a reliable mobility endpoint and a strong candidate for clinical validation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAccelerometryAlgorithmsExerciseHumansNeural Networks, Computeraccelerometerbioinfomaticsdeep learninghealthcaremedicinestep countwearable

Identifiers

PMID35684609
PMCPMC9183122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.