ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Effect of the Back-Pressure Changes in an Exhaust System on Vibration When Attaching a Variable Device during Idling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vibration of the ignition frequency component of the engine during idling causes driver discomfort. To minimize this, an optimal exhaust system with a variable device that can exert optimal pressure is required. In this study, the geometry of the variable device was designed in orifice and cylinder types. Next, the designed variable devices were implemented in a conventional exhaust system with an X chamber. A comparative analysis was conducted to propose an optimal geometry through back-pressure and vibration measurements. During the experiment, the orifice geometry exhibited higher back pressure than the conventional geometry and a large difference in back pressure before and at the exhaust gas merging position. Furthermore, the orifice geometry showed a 2.56% increase in the vibration of the 1X component in the Y-axis direction. By contrast, the cylinder geometry exhibited slightly higher back pressure than the conventional geometry and the smallest difference in back pressure before and at the exhaust gas merging position. The cylinder geometry showed a 2.45% reduction in the vibration of the 1X component in the Y-axis direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.