Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684600›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Personalised Gait Recognition for People with Neurological Conditions.

Leon Ingelse, Diogo Branco, Hristijan Gjoreski, Tiago Guerreiro, Raquel Bouça-Machado, Joaquim J Ferreira, The Cns Physiotherapy Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leon IngelseLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6067-6318
Diogo BrancoLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-3907
Hristijan GjoreskiFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0002-0770-4268
Tiago GuerreiroLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Raquel Bouça-MachadoInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3756-2763
Joaquim J FerreiraInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
The Cns Physiotherapy Study GroupCNS-Campus Neurológico, 2560-280 Torres Vedras, Portugal.

Funding

European Commission 952279Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/144242/2019Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00408/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/00408/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in monitoring gait patterns in people with neurological conditions. The democratisation of wearable inertial sensors has enabled the study of gait in free living environments. One pivotal aspect of gait assessment in uncontrolled environments is the ability to accurately recognise gait instances. Previous work has focused on wavelet transform methods or general machine learning models to detect gait; the former assume a comparable gait pattern between people and the latter assume training datasets that represent a diverse population. In this paper, we argue that these approaches are unsuitable for people with severe motor impairments and their distinct gait patterns, and make the case for a lightweight personalised alternative. We propose an approach that builds on top of a general model, fine-tuning it with personalised data. A comparative proof-of-concept evaluation with general machine learning (NN and CNN) approaches and personalised counterparts showed that the latter improved the overall accuracy in 3.5% for the NN and 5.3% for the CNN. More importantly, participants that were ill-represented by the general model (the most extreme cases) had the recognition of gait instances improved by up to 16.9% for NN and 20.5% for CNN with the personalised approaches. It is common to say that people with neurological conditions, such as Parkinson's disease, present very individual motor patterns, and that in a sense they are all outliers; we expect that our results will motivate researchers to explore alternative approaches that value personalisation rather than harvesting datasets that are may be able to represent these differences.

Indexed as

GaitParkinson DiseaseHumansMachine LearningProof of Concept StudyWavelet Analysisaccelerometersgait recognitionmotor impairmentsneural networksneurological conditionspersonalisation

Identifiers

PMID35684600
PMCPMC9183078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.