Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35684152›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Evaluating the Nutritional Properties of Food: A Scoping Review.

Pei Wang, Jiazhang Huang, Junmao Sun, Rui Liu, Tong Jiang, Guiju Sun

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pei WangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3077-3920
Jiazhang HuangInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4441-2766
Junmao SunInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.
Rui LiuInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.
Tong JiangBeijing Billion Power Nutrition Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100069, China.
Guiju SunKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5969-2185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many methods or indicators used for evaluating the nutritional value of foods; however, it is difficult to accurately reflect the comprehensive nutritional value of a food with a single indicator, and a systematic evaluation system is lacking. In this article, we systematically summarize the common evaluation methods and indicators of the nutritional value of foods. The purpose of this review was to establish an evaluation procedure for nutritional properties of foodstuffs and to help scientists choose more direct and economical evaluation methods according to food types or relevant indicators. The procedure involves the selection of a three-level evaluation method that covers the whole spectrum of a food's nutritional characteristics. It is applicable to scientific research in the fields of agricultural science, food science, nutrition, and so on.

Indexed as

FoodNutritional StatusNutritive Valueevaluation indicatorevaluation methodnutritional value of foodnutrition evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35684152
PMCPMC9182956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.