Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683947›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Biodeterioration of Microplastics: A Promising Step towards Plastics Waste Management.

Aatikah Tareen, Saira Saeed, Atia Iqbal, Rida Batool, Nazia Jamil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Determination of Biodegradation Potential ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aatikah TareenDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The Women University Multan, Multan 66000, Pakistan.
Saira SaeedDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The Women University Multan, Multan 66000, Pakistan.
Atia IqbalDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The Women University Multan, Multan 66000, Pakistan.
Rida BatoolInstitute of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-1563
Nazia JamilInstitute of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4252-7954
The Women University Multan · PKUniversity of the Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyethylene and Polyester materials are resistant to degradation and a significant source of microplastics pollution, which is an emerging concern. In the present study, the potential of a dumped site bacterial community was evaluated. After primary screening, it was observed that 68.5% were linear low-density polyethylene, 33.3% were high-density, and 12.9% were Polyester degraders. Five strains were chosen for secondary screening, in which they were monitored by FTIR, SEM and weight loss degradation trials. Major results were observed for

Indexed as

landfillmicro-pollutantspolyesterpolyethylenesoil biota

Identifiers

PMID35683947
PMCPMC9182643
OpenAlexW4281783933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.