Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35683946›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Biodegradable Nonwoven Agrotextile and Films-A Review.

Dragana Kopitar, Paula Marasovic, Nikola Jugov, Ivana Schwarz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dragana KopitarDepartment of Textile Design and Management, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Prilaz baruna Filipovica 28a, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-2548
Paula MarasovicDepartment of Textile Design and Management, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Prilaz baruna Filipovica 28a, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9887-5651
Nikola JugovDepartment of Textile Design and Management, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Prilaz baruna Filipovica 28a, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana SchwarzDepartment of Textile Design and Management, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Prilaz baruna Filipovica 28a, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-6163-0557

Funding

European Union European from the European Structural and Investment Funds, the Operational programme Competitiveness and Cohesion, the European Regional Development Fund KK.01.2.1.02.0270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As society becomes more aware of environmental pollution, global warming, and environmental disasters, people are increasingly turning to sustainable materials and products. This includes agrotextiles in a wide range of products, including nonwoven agrotextiles for mulching. This review provides insight into relevant available data and information on the condition, possibilities, and trends of nonwoven mulches from natural fibres, biopolymers, and recycled sources. The basic definitions and differences between biodegradation and composting processes are explained, and the current standards related to biodegradation are presented. In addition, an insight into the biodegradation of various nonwoven mulches and films, including their advantages and disadvantages, is provided, to predict the future directions of nonwoven mulches development.

Indexed as

biodegradabilitybiopolymersmulchnatural fibresnonwoven fabricrecycled mulches

Identifiers

PMID35683946
PMCPMC9182797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.